ABSTRACT
Introduction: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is part of the work routine of health professionals, especially during pandemics. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the use of PPE became constant for long working hours, resulting in adverse effects on the health of professionals, especially headache. Objective: In this review, we explore the scientific literature on headache associated with prolonged use of PPE during the coronavirus pandemic. Method: This is a narrative literature review conducted through the PubMed and Web of Science databases according to the following MeSH descriptors: "Face shield", "Headache" and "Covid-19". Articles that analyzed the presence of headache and other adverse events in health professionals in prolonged use of PPE were included. Results: The included studies point to headache as the most prevalent adverse event, which may be a new headache or the worsening of a previous headache. Other effects were also found, such as pressure marks on the skin, hyperemia in contact areas; suffocation; reduced concentration and excessive sweating. Conclusion: The use of PPE for long periods can cause headaches due to external pressure, in addition to other unwanted events.These effects reveal the importance of studies to make PPE more efficient, ensuring protection for the individual without causing discomfort.
Introdução: Os Equipamentos de Proteção Individual (EPI) fazem parte da rotina de trabalho dos profissionais de saúde, principalmente durante as pandemias. Durante a pandemia da Covid-19, o uso de EPI tornou-se constante durante longas jornadas de trabalho, resultando em efeitos adversos à saúde dos profissionais, principalmente cefaleia. Objetivo: Nesta revisão, exploramos a literatura científica sobre cefaleia associada ao uso prolongado de EPI durante a pandemia do coronavírus. Método: Trata-se de uma revisão narrativa da literatura realizada por meio das bases de dados PubMed e Web of Science segundo os seguintes descritores MeSH: "Face Shield", "Headache" e "Covid-19". Foram incluídos artigos que analisaram a presença de cefaleia e outros eventos adversos em profissionais de saúde em uso prolongado de EPI. Resultados: Os estudos incluídos apontam a cefaleia como o evento adverso mais prevalente, podendo ser uma nova cefaleia ou o agravamento de uma cefaleia anterior. Também foram encontrados outros efeitos, como marcas de pressão na pele, hiperemia nas áreas de contato; asfixia; concentração reduzida e transpiração excessiva. Conclusão: O uso de EPI por longos períodos pode causar dores de cabeça por pressão externa, além de outros eventos indesejados. Esses efeitos revelam a importância de estudos para tornar os EPI mais eficientes, garantindo proteção ao indivíduo sem causar desconforto.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The uncertainties about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the change in routine, lifestyles and the reduction of physical contact can cause stress, anxiety, emotional overload, poor sleep and even physical health complications. AIM: To evaluate the scientific publications available on the relationship between COVID-19 and anxiety experienced in the general population, during the period of social isolation, adopted by governmental organizations and public health policymakers as a measure to contain the spread of cases. METHODS: A literature search was performed systematically exploring the PubMed and Medline databases using the following terms classified as MeSH descriptors: ("anxiety" AND "pandemic" AND "COVID-19"). For the search, in the Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde - BVS, Science.gov, Web of Science and National Library platforms, the following keywords were used: ("anxiety" AND "coronavirus" AND "social isolation"). Thirty-seven peer-reviewed articles were found. PRISMA and the Downs & Black checklist were used for qualitative evaluation. RESULTS: After applying the inclusion criteria, seven (n = 7) original scientific articles were selected. The collated evidence demonstrated increased levels of symptoms of anxiety and depression during the period of social isolation. The population between 21 to 40 years was most affected. The risk of severe depression was twice as high at the epicenter of the pandemic. Sleep quality was significantly impaired. Questions about politics, religion, and consumption of products from China were found to generate fear and anticipate probable changes in the pattern of post-pandemic consumption. Social isolation exacerbated feelings of extreme hopelessness, sadness, loneliness and suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is a potential relationship between social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic and symptoms of anxiety. It is important to note that the direct and indirect costs of not identifying the detrimental effects of this phenomenon and neglecting strategies for intervention could lead to a significant psychological burden on society in several aspects after social isolation.
